phone line avoidance

Char and I moved from Jamaica Plain to Somerville, and I had a feeling that our phone reception would suck in the new apartment. Indeed it does. Furthermore my phone, the Sony-Ericsson T610, is known as not getting the best reception in the first place. Basically, I can’t make or receive voice calls in my apartment without doing gymnastics or running outside. Suck.

So, the hunt was on for a solution to my phone reception woes. I saw three possible solutions:

  • Get a regular phone line (40$/mo)
  • Get a cell phone antenna booster (a real one) ($200+)
  • Get Skype VOIP working (.017€/min)

All of these options required an initial payment, but Skype’s was by far the cheapest. For 10€ you get about 10 hours of talk time. I was worried that, even though there’s a Skype linux client, there would be some problem with my microphone or something.

Skype works as advertised — very easy, no troubles. You have to remember the +1 before dialling an outside number. My dad said that the sound was a little low, so I got a 10$ microphone from Micro Center and hooked it up.

So now I can make outgoing calls with no problem. A note to my friends, when I make a Skype call the Caller ID shows up as “unknown.” So next time you get an Unknown call it might be me. As of yet there’s no way to get incoming calls from a phone. Skype says they’re working on that. For now, it’s easiest to send me a text message or instant message and ask me to call. I can still get and receive text from the apartment.

The rate is .017€/min, which is low enough that I don’t care (micropayments in action!). I don’t use a phone enough to warrant a whole phone line, and trying to boost my cell phone reception is more faith-based than reailty-based.

For the investment I had to make (20$), Skype is a steal. Some people might be annoyed by the lack of phone handset, but I’m a hip young person and I can deal with talking at a laptop.

Red Sox Parade

Here is a panorama I took of the redsox parade the other weekend. The fullsize image is 11530×984 and 1.8 Megs, so be prepared. I used hugin, which is a powerful but awfully-written piece of software. It crashes, it doesn’t make sense, and then just when you’re about to give up it actually stitches together a proper panorama.

Here’s a slice of the image so you get an idea of what it looks like.

The Great Pumpkin Show

Char and I went to The Great Pumpkin Show in Salem, New Hampshire. It was really fun, and there were a ton of pumpkins. There were two basic types: traditional eyes-nose-mouth pumpkins of various configurations, many of which could have been carved by anybody; and Artist Pumpkins. The technique here involved getting not carving through the pumpkin, but scratching away at the surface. In this way various amounts of light could be let through, resulting in a sort of grayscale effect. They would also shade in areas with a sharpie to make them blacker. All of the “image-like” pumpkins were carved in this way.

Many pumpkins were scary

Many were not

[600×800][1200×1600]
A great example of the grayscale technique.

We visited on November 6th, so by then a lot of the pumpkins were starting to rot. Many were still fresh, but many were collapsing.

[800×600][1600×1200]
Collapsing Bush and Scary Kerry

The flash makes things look pretty crappy. I tried about 5 different ways of setting my camera up to photograph the pumpkins, but really I needed a tripod I didn’t have.

[800×600][1600×1200]
This is a huge pumpkin. The one behind it is average-sized.

[800×600][1600×1200]
This had incredibly even tones

[800×600][1600×1200]
Extra carving on the lanterns makes them glow

[800×600][1600×1200]
Char did not like this one